We have an important decision as preachers this week: How do we talk about demonic possession? I want to begin by saying, I don’t think there is a totally wrong answer here. There will be a lot of debate among commentaries and articles that talk about not negating the power of these texts. There will be some commentaries that talk about demonic possession as part of the apocalyptic genre. There will be some social media clergy debates about whether or not we should describe medical conditions, mental health struggles, or addiction as examples of demonic possession. There are a number of pitfalls to each of these arguments (more than I can cover here). There are a number of very good points to these arguments (some of which I hope to cover). But at the end of the day, I think there’s only one explanation that would totally miss the mark. That the people of Mark and Jesus’ time were ignorant and didn’t understand a medical thing and thus these stories no longer apply to us. If you hear me say anything in this commentary, hear this. Regardless of if these texts are describing supernatural forces, medical conditions, mental health struggles, or addiction, a human being is suffering and is separated from the community and from feeling the love of God. And in these moments, Jesus breaks down that barrier so the person can be restored to community and to feeling the love of God. There is meaning in these texts for us today. There is no reason to throw them away.
Mark 1:14-20 (Third Sunday after Epiphany) – January 21, 2024
I love this pericope because it comes with a good contextual introduction. Verses 14 & 15 are really the end of Mark’s apocalyptic prologue, but they also function as a transition into the calling of these first four disciples. In contrast with Matthew, Jesus does not open with the same words as John the Baptist. These are fresh new words. John alludes to the coming of Jesus but in Mark it is only Jesus who announces that the kingdom of God has come near. John is not transitioning authority to Jesus (like in Matthew). John is merely the herald. Only Jesus knows what the coming kingdom means. Now, John’s being arrested serves two purposes. First, practically speaking, John needs to step out of the picture. As a familiar character to first century hearers, there would have been questions of the importance of John. Mark sidesteps that. John is arrested and he is no longer in the story. Enter Jesus. But there is another purpose, too. John’s arrest is an apocalyptic foreboding as well. The bringing of God’s gospel (good news), even for someone who is merely the herald, is a dangerous gig. To embark in this work will mean entering into the fray against the forces that defy God (worldly and other worldly). The time has come. The kingdom is near.
John 1:43-51 (Second Sunday after Epiphany) – January 14, 2024
There are dozens upon dozens of ways to center this text and there are a lot of beautiful nuances to the language and verb tenses chosen by the author that uplift greater meaning. And so, if you aren’t finding what you’re looking for in this commentary, I encourage you to read Karoline Lewis’ commentary on John[1] (see footnote for link) or Gail R. O’Day and Susan E. Hylen’s commentary on John[2] (see footnote for link). There are good themes around invitation (come and see), finding and being found, and witnessing that can be found in this text (but it is more than I can cover in this commentary). For me, what’s sticking out this week is identity.
Mark 1:4-11 (Baptism of our Lord) – January 7th, 2024
We’re only 4 verses into Mark’s Gospel and we are already in full preparation for Jesus’ baptism. But as I said a few weeks ago in Advent when we heard vs. 1-8, this is all a part of the prologue of Mark. Even though it feels like we are plopped right in the middle of the story, this scene and introduction to John and Jesus are just that: an introduction. Something distinct from the overall story that lets us, as readers, get a taste of what is to come and a sense of what it will all mean. In this introduction, we are being introduced to the unequivocal power and authority of Jesus as the Son of God (Son of man/humanity), before he will be questioned relentlessly by the earthly world. Why do I say all of this? Because the beauty of the Gospel of Mark is the myth of the Messianic Secret. Mark is not hiding who Jesus is. Mark tells us explicitly right from the very beginning and almost every hearer knows a little about where the story is going. But like those who miss the signs of Jesus (who miss the blatant presence of God), we will walk with Jesus and question why he does things the way he does. We will question why it must be this way. We will forget that he is God, and we are not. Even with this grand introduction, we will do the very same things that the world does to him in this narrative.
Luke 1:26-38, 46b-55, 2:1-20 (4th Sunday of Advent and Christmas Eve) – December 24th, 2023
This will certainly offend Advent purists, but this is the perfect year to do a little mixing a matching with Advent 4 this year (especially if you have a morning service). Because of Year B’s inclusion of the annunciation and the inclusion of the Magnificat this week, we can tell the long story of who Jesus is promised to be, who he was entrusted to, and how he came into the world. Knowing that many will be picking and choosing how to preach very carefully, I’ll throw out a couple preaching possibilities here and hope that something sticks for you.
John 1:6-8, 19-28 (3rd Sunday of Advent) – December 17, 2023
While I often criticize the decisions of the RCL’s structure, I don’t often completely dismiss it. However, if one were to dismiss it, this might be the week (as you could preach on next week’s Lukan text since it will be Christmas Eve). I get frustrated by this week’s text because it’s almost an exact repeat of last week’s Gospel and contains some deliberate contradictions because Mark and John have different theologies.
Mark 1:1-8 (2nd Sunday of Advent) – December 10, 2023
Where Do We Begin? Of course, what’s driven into us as preachers and seminarians is the difference in the beginnings of all the Gospels. But that’s not always articulated to our congregations. It’s important to note to our listeners, that this is in fact the beginning of Mark’s Gospel. There’s no manger or wise men. No stars, no angels. Just the beginning of the good news. But there’s a nuance to this. When people describe the differences, Mark is often the least talked about of the four gospels. We say, “Mark just jumps right in” and then describe the beginnings of all three others. And in comparison, to the other three, sure, that seems to be the case. But on its own, we should notice that Mark actually begins with a prologue and not right in the story. Mark 1:1-15 is all a prologue. And it’s critically important because it sets us up as a reader to see that Mark’s gospel is an apocalyptic drama.[1] And this is a two-fold apocalyptic view: 1) The immanent end-times that are coming with the Kingdom of God 2) And the revelation of Jesus as the Messiah and Son of God.
Mark 13:24-37 (1st Sunday of Advent) – December 3rd, 2023
In this week’s Gospel, Jesus is leaving the temple with his disciples after having been interrogated and tested by a series of religious leaders. Now out of context, our reading today sounds pretty scary. The sun being darkened out. Stars falling from heaven. The end of heaven and earth. And yet this passage is about hope.
Matthew 25:31-46 (Christ the King) – November 26, 2023
I have already made connection to this parable a number of times the last few weeks. I believe that this is the most important parable that we get in the Matthew’s gospel. I think it is also one of the most important Christological and Incarnational passages that we get as well. This is the text that helps us see most clearly Bonhoeffer’s words, “The church is only church when it is there for others. As a first step it must give away all its property to those in need. The clergy must live solely on the freewill offerings of the congregations and perhaps be engaged in some secular vocation. The church must participate in the worldly tasks of life in the community—nor dominating by helping and serving. It must tell people in every calling what a life with Christ is, what it means “to be there for others.’ In particular, our church will have to confront the vices of hubris, the worship of power, envy, and illusionism as the roots of all evil. It will have to speak of moderation, authenticity, trust, faithfulness, steadfastness, patience, discipline, humility, modesty, contentment. It will have to see that it does not underestimate the significance of the human ‘example’ (which has its origin in the humanity of Jesus and is so important in Paul’s writings!); the church’s word gains weight and power not through concepts but by example.” This is the text that calls us to see God in our neighbor.
Matthew 25:14-30 (25th Sunday after Pentecost) – November 19, 2023
As the Assistant to the Bishop for Generosity in the Delaware-Maryland Synod, maybe I shouldn’t be actively negating this text as a stewardship parable. But I think that this text is actually yet another cautionary tale for our disciples and future leaders of the church. Absolute Power You know the phrase. And so does everyone in our pews. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. As soon as the first two slaves have money in their hand, they begin to use it in ways that will gain them more. That was never the instruction of the master, but it’s immediately what they do? Why? Because power consumes us. Wealth and it’s allure consumes us. We see it additionally in the response of the master too. Again, there was never any explicit instruction that the slaves were required to turn a profit. But after the first two slaves produced a profit, then the master expected the third slave to produce a profit as well.
