I love this reading. It comes completely out of nowhere (and this jump from chapter 3 to chapter 12 is absurd), but this is such an incredible scene in John. And if you are preaching John this Sunday, you’ll need to explain where we are in the story. Because otherwise none of this feels urgent but in actuality everything is right on the edge.
John 3:14-21 (4th Sunday in Lent) – March 10, 2024
If you’ve been following this commentary for a while, you know that I’m all about narrative. The context of the story matters. I feel that these authors/storytellers were incredibly sophisticated in their compositions of these gospels and so it’s important to know how they are placing these passages within the context of the overall narrative. And I still believe that. But I’m not sure it’s as important this week. Of course, this is the great story introduction to Nicodemus (who will come around two more times in the gospel). But if ever there was a pericope that fell outside of the context, it’s this one. Apart from vs 14 and 15, the rest of the passage seems to be a narrative aside. Do we think that Jesus continued to speak to Nicodemus in this way from 16-21? No, this is a beautiful aside that helps the reader/listener understand the depth of where the story is going.
John 2:13-22 (3rd Sunday in Lent) – March 3, 2024
In the Synoptics we can see the tension and the conflict before, during, and after this scene. We’ve been told that the tension is coming (like in last week’s Gospel when Jesus first pronounces his death and resurrection) and it can be argued that this temple scene is the catalyst that forces the hand of the religious leaders to have him arrested. But today’s version comes from John. And if we look closely, there’s not actually any external conflict around it (outside of the most violent Jesus we see in any of the gospels, fashioning a whip of cords). We are conditioned (because of the Synoptics) to read this version as being full of “passion” conflict and that immediately Jesus is in trouble and moves him toward the cross. But that’s not how the Jewish authorities respond. Instead, they respond with curiosity.
Mark 8:31-38 (2nd Sunday in Lent) – February 25, 2024
This pericope will actually come up twice in year B. First will be this coming Sunday in Lent and then with a slightly longer pericope (8:27-38) in mid-September. In September we’ll get the fuller scene as Jesus asks who people say he is and Peter answering that he is the Messiah. Then of course, this scene for this week becomes more comical (or sad depending on your take) because Peter is then immediately scolded for not understanding what Jesus must go through. But even though there are many months between these texts, it can be challenging to preach on the same text multiple times in a year. Especially if you are taking a narrative approach. And truthfully, Epiphany into Lent doesn’t do us any favors in understanding Mark in year B. There is very little narrative lead up to this text. And so, while I think we can take some time to remind folks that Peter did just proclaim Jesus as the Messiah, there’s only so much we can do to catch people up on the narrative. That will be much easier to do in September after we’ve been going through Mark chapter by chapter.
Mark 1:9-15 (1st Sunday in Lent) – February 18, 2024
This pericope is short and packed with action that is all a part of this quick Markan prologue. It illustrates that Jesus’ coming and the ministry he will do is cosmic in nature. Before he even begins his teaching in Galilee, Jesus is already entering into the cosmic battle against the forces that defy God. He stands toe to toe with Satan and it’s such an easy win that it only takes one sentence. But I think there is something interesting in how that is then compared to the rest of the Gospel. Yes, we should treat this as a short prologue and introduction. Yes, Mark isn’t focusing on this part of the story and seems to may be trying to skip to the ministry part. But even still, it brings up an interesting point. Is dealing with humanity harder than dealing with Satan?
Mark 9:2-9 (Transfiguration Sunday) – February 11th, 2024
Year B can be particularly jarring as we move from the early story of Jesus’ ministry (not even getting out of chapter 1 in the Mark) and then jumping into the middle of the Gospel with the transfiguration. We skip over a lot: Teaching parables, the exorcism of Legion, the healing of Jairus’ daughter and the woman with hemorrhages, commissioning the twelve, Herod’s execution of John the Baptist, the feeding of the 5,000 (and 4,000), the Syrophoenician woman, and Peter’s declaration of Jesus as the Messiah. Incredible stories and great imagery. While these are important, in many ways these are stories that already expound upon who we have seen Jesus to be even within just the first chapter. So what does the transfiguration show us that's different?
Mark 1:29-39 (5th Sunday after Epiphany) – February 4th, 2024
This week we get an all-encompassing transition scene. This is between two powerful moments, the exorcising of a demon and the healing of a man with leprosy, two circumstances that radically pushed people away from God and community at this time. So, in this transition, Jesus heals Peter’s mother-in-law (so yes, Peter is married and that means Peter has left his family to follow Jesus), he heals and exorcizes many in the community who are brought to him, and finally he retreats away for some time for himself. So, what do we do with this transition scene? I think there are few interesting pieces that could lead us into some preaching possibilities.
Mark 1:21-28 (4th Sunday after Epiphany) – January 28, 2024
We have an important decision as preachers this week: How do we talk about demonic possession? I want to begin by saying, I don’t think there is a totally wrong answer here. There will be a lot of debate among commentaries and articles that talk about not negating the power of these texts. There will be some commentaries that talk about demonic possession as part of the apocalyptic genre. There will be some social media clergy debates about whether or not we should describe medical conditions, mental health struggles, or addiction as examples of demonic possession. There are a number of pitfalls to each of these arguments (more than I can cover here). There are a number of very good points to these arguments (some of which I hope to cover). But at the end of the day, I think there’s only one explanation that would totally miss the mark. That the people of Mark and Jesus’ time were ignorant and didn’t understand a medical thing and thus these stories no longer apply to us. If you hear me say anything in this commentary, hear this. Regardless of if these texts are describing supernatural forces, medical conditions, mental health struggles, or addiction, a human being is suffering and is separated from the community and from feeling the love of God. And in these moments, Jesus breaks down that barrier so the person can be restored to community and to feeling the love of God. There is meaning in these texts for us today. There is no reason to throw them away.
Mark 1:14-20 (Third Sunday after Epiphany) – January 21, 2024
I love this pericope because it comes with a good contextual introduction. Verses 14 & 15 are really the end of Mark’s apocalyptic prologue, but they also function as a transition into the calling of these first four disciples. In contrast with Matthew, Jesus does not open with the same words as John the Baptist. These are fresh new words. John alludes to the coming of Jesus but in Mark it is only Jesus who announces that the kingdom of God has come near. John is not transitioning authority to Jesus (like in Matthew). John is merely the herald. Only Jesus knows what the coming kingdom means. Now, John’s being arrested serves two purposes. First, practically speaking, John needs to step out of the picture. As a familiar character to first century hearers, there would have been questions of the importance of John. Mark sidesteps that. John is arrested and he is no longer in the story. Enter Jesus. But there is another purpose, too. John’s arrest is an apocalyptic foreboding as well. The bringing of God’s gospel (good news), even for someone who is merely the herald, is a dangerous gig. To embark in this work will mean entering into the fray against the forces that defy God (worldly and other worldly). The time has come. The kingdom is near.
John 1:43-51 (Second Sunday after Epiphany) – January 14, 2024
There are dozens upon dozens of ways to center this text and there are a lot of beautiful nuances to the language and verb tenses chosen by the author that uplift greater meaning. And so, if you aren’t finding what you’re looking for in this commentary, I encourage you to read Karoline Lewis’ commentary on John[1] (see footnote for link) or Gail R. O’Day and Susan E. Hylen’s commentary on John[2] (see footnote for link). There are good themes around invitation (come and see), finding and being found, and witnessing that can be found in this text (but it is more than I can cover in this commentary). For me, what’s sticking out this week is identity.
